Github Reviews vs Reviewboard

[Menno Smits]

The votes are in: Github 8, Reviewboard 5. It looks like we stick with
Github Reviews.

I'm going to email some people now about tearing down the Reviewboard
instance.

On 15 October 2016 at 06:57, Casey Marshall <casey.marshall at canonical.com>
wrote:

> +1, as I work on many other Github projects besides Juju and it's
> familiar. It's not perfect by any means but I can work with it.
>
> I thought the ReviewBoard we had was pretty ugly and buggy, but it was
> reasonably easy to use. Gerrit is cleaner and clearer to me -- though I
> feel like Gerrit is also kind of rough on the uninitiated. Maybe if a newer
> version of RB was sufficiently improved and it was charmed up well, its
> operation would be more manageable, and it'd be OK?
>
> -Casey
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Andrew McDermott <
> andrew.mcdermott at canonical.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 14 October 2016 at 16:26, Mick Gregg <mick.gregg at canonical.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I would probably chose gerrit over either, but that's not the question
>>> today.
>>>
>>
>> Oooh, yes to gerrit. +2
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Andrew McDermott <andrew.mcdermott at canonical.com>
>> Juju Core Sapphire team <http://juju.ubuntu.com>
>>
>> --
>> Juju-dev mailing list
>> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailm
>> an/listinfo/juju-dev
>>
>>
>
> --
> Juju-dev mailing list
> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/
> mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/20161025/63b35e3e/attachment.html>