"juju attach"

[Andrew Wilkins]

On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 1:51 AM Mark Shuttleworth <mark at ubuntu.com> wrote:

> On 18/06/16 16:45, Marco Ceppi wrote:
> >
> > Why not just "add" which is already pretty well used. Throughout the
> > Juju CLI.
> >
>
> Well, I think the context here is more attach-a-disk. I really like
> Roger's suggestion of 'mount', it immediately brings all the right
> elements into focus, and it's only one syllable.
>

I concur that add is not really appropriate here, and that mount makes a
lot of sense for storage (thanks for the suggestion, Roger). For me,
"attach" does not have similar connotations re resources, but at least
there's no looming danger of conflict with storage. I can't think of a
better single word, either.

We've got hooks called "storage-attached", and "storage-detaching", which
are in use by existing charms, and baked into charm helpers and probably
elsewhere. I don't think we can/should change these, or we'll have charms
that work with 2.0 but not 1.25, and vice versa. I think we should change
the statuses though, to keep the user-visible parts aligned.

Cheers,
Andrew


> Mark
>
> --
> Juju-dev mailing list
> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/20160619/1409221d/attachment.html>