LXD support (maybe)

[James Tunnicliffe]

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 4:49 AM, Ian Booth <ian.booth at canonical.com> wrote:
>>> I personally encourage us to use heterogeneous versions of go as much as
>>> we can. Because we should be compatible as much as possible. But it does
>>> look like our dependencies are going to force our hand.
>>
>> Agreed. I think it's healthy for Juju's devs to be using a range of Go
>> versions (within reason). It helps to ensure we not relying on version
>> specific behaviour.
>
> +1. And I like life on the edge, so 1.6 for me :-D

FWIW I am using 1.6 and haven't experienced any problems. I have seen
the new vet and runtime show problems up that weren't previously
detected. Not writing backwards incompatible code will be "fun", but I
doubt I will try and use %X over %x in a format string.

James