LXD support (maybe)

[John Meinel]

A fair point. But I'll note that we are trying to get go >= 1.5 into trusty
back ports and use that for Juju 2.0
We need something better than 1.2 that is in Trusty to build the lxd
bindings at all, and we've wanted to move forward to not have to fight with
all the dependencies that have already moved forward.

I personally encourage us to use heterogeneous versions of go as much as we
can. Because we should be compatible as much as possible. But it does look
like our dependencies are going to force our hand.

John
=:->
On Feb 26, 2016 7:14 AM, "Menno Smits" <menno.smits at canonical.com> wrote:

> On 26 February 2016 at 11:41, Ian Booth <ian.booth at canonical.com> wrote:
>
>> FWIW, go 1.6 works just fine with Juju on my system
>>
>
> My reason for not using Go 1.6 on my machine is that it's not what the
> official Juju releases are built with (yet) and it's not what CI uses.
>
>
>
> --
> Juju-dev mailing list
> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/20160226/d84db097/attachment.html>