A (Very) Minimal Charm

[Stuart Bishop]

On 16 December 2016 at 22:33, Katherine Cox-Buday <
katherine.cox-buday at canonical.com> wrote:

> Tim Penhey <tim.penhey at canonical.com> writes:
>
> > Make sure you also run on LXD with a decent delay to the APT archive.
>
> Open question: is there any reason we shouldn't expect charm authors to
> take a hard-right towards charms with snaps embedded as resources? I know
> one of our long-standing conceptual problems is consistency across units
> which snaps solves nicely.
>

https://github.com/stub42/layer-snap is how I'm expecting things to go.
There is already one charm in the ~charmers review queue using it and I'm
aware of several more in various stages of development.

More work is needed though. In particular, Juju storage is inaccessible to
snaps, because there is no way to reach it from inside the containment.

(But none of this is a reason to not optimize Juju unit provisioning times,
since we will still need an environment setup capable of running the charms
so they can install the snaps for some time yet).

-- 
Stuart Bishop <stuart.bishop at canonical.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/20161217/fd57876e/attachment.html>