A (Very) Minimal Charm

[Mark Shuttleworth]

On 09/12/16 06:32, John Meinel wrote:
>
>  1. "charm push cs:~jameinel/ubuntu-lite" fails ultimately with a TLS
>     timeout error:
>     ERROR cannot post archive: Post
>     https://api.jujucharms.com/charmstore/v5/~jameinel/ubuntu-lite/archive?..
>     <https://api.jujucharms.com/charmstore/v5/%7Ejameinel/ubuntu-lite/archive?..>.:
>     net/http: TLS handshake timeout
>     I thought the point of multi-series charms is that you didn't have
>     to publish to an explicit series.
>

You should be validated that there are *some* relevant series, with one
as the default.

>  1. The result of a successful push tells you "unpublished". But the
>     command to actually publish one is "charm release". Should we be
>     using the verbiage of "unreleased"? Certainly there was no
>     indication of what I should be doing to get the charm to a
>     'published' state from the CLI.
>

Yes, that makes sense, the feedback should use the 'release' term and
should tell you how to make that happen. It should also be possible to
have the push command also --release [channels]

>  1. ubuntu-lite does get from "pending" to "active" a fair bit faster
>     than the full 'ubuntu' charm (about 1-2 minutes on my LXD provider.)
>

Sounds like we can make reactive a little leaner.

Mark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/20161209/a7b5b853/attachment.html>