Latest new about Juju master branch - upload-tools obsoleted

[Tim Penhey]

On 16/08/16 10:50, Ian Booth wrote:
>
> On 16/08/16 03:09, Nate Finch wrote:
>> Ian, can you describe how Juju decides if it's running for a developer or
>> an end user?  I'm worried this could trip people up who are both end users
>> and happen to have a juju development environment.
>>
>
> It's not so much Juju deciding - the use cases given were from the point of view
> of a developer or end user.
>
> Juju will decide that it can automatically fallback to try to find and use a
> local jujud (so long as the version of the jujud found matches that of the Juju
> client being used to bootstrap or upgrade) if:
>
> - the Juju client version is newer than the agents running
> - the client or agents have a build number > 0
>
> (the build number is 0 for released Juju agents but non zero when jujud is used
> or built locally from source).

But this isn't entirely true is it? The build number is a horrible hack 
involving a version override file.

When I build jujud locally from source there is no version override and 
it is just the version as defined in the code I'm building.

Tim