LXD polish for xenial

[Aaron Bentley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2016-04-20 04:20 AM, roger peppe wrote:
> The fact that the command to manipulate lxd containers was named
> "lxc" added to my confusion.

I think it's a poor choice to use a command named "lxc" to manipulate
lxd containers if they're different from lxc containers.  e.g.
lxc-list won't show 'em.

Which is one way that silently translating lxc -> lxd could poke users
in the eye; they may run lxc-manipulating commands later and be
confused.  A warning would probably make sense.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXF4ozAAoJEK84cMOcf+9hLRQIALAL46e5Wb9TPHDyj6upMQlY
mQ6c7z8mk/2mLBPP787DvDH1s6eAkxTfhs8PXrANMZwZ0trHno7USlxe13L+in3X
oPFmlP5fEEVMA5EqFGw+nenjDeu/AC35lqXBpKz5OpZFNoZIGpukTwbtmFvWZlJj
mWT1ahilrcl6jzxnkviPzTGhN3tC3d2pbvxVAMw+z+faWIuK5GhiXPo6mLFs+Unh
U79XgZOAKDCBRzxTgmnI+/1WjxQ2dqR/qlcB+sHmipj8CS0ujerEwXQz1bhEEQhS
nXhdMAcgyH8OoXDaxif74MNGxjb+B1RyPHU1/KSQWuxgDhmwHvr+CsVHxIXS4Ds=
=ynuy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----