LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

[Horacio Duran]

yes, that workaround works, also you can change /etc/default/lxd-bridge and
restart the lxd-bridge service.

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Casey Marshall <casey.marshall at canonical.com
> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Alexis Bruemmer <
> alexis.bruemmer at canonical.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> As recently highlighted in bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1566589 the
>> latest LXD will not work with Juju 2.0-beta3.  This is a result of LXD
>> moving to use a default bridge of lxdbr0 and Juju expecting lxcbr0.  Thanks
>> to the heads up and help from the LXD team there is a fix for this in Juju
>> master that will be available in the release next week.  However, until
>> then Juju 2.0-beta3 will not work with the latest LXD (v2.0.0-rc8).
>>
>
> If you `dpkg-reconfigure lxd` and name the bridge "lxcbr0", does this work
> for beta3? I've been able to bootstrap with latest LXD and current Juju
> master (beta4) by configuring LXD this way.
>
>
>>
>> Alexis
>>
>> --
>> Alexis Bruemmer
>> Juju Core Manager, Canonical Ltd.
>> (503) 686-5018
>> alexis.bruemmer at canonical.com
>>
>> --
>> Juju mailing list
>> Juju at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>>
>>
>
> --
> Juju-dev mailing list
> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/20160406/bf3737f1/attachment.html>