Unable to kill-controller

[Nate Finch]

Oh I see.  Yes, I agree that we should always try the right way first and
only use the provider if necessary (especially if using the provider leaves
garbage around).

It seems like there's no reason why we couldn't make a --force flag do it
that way in 2.0 (aside from time constraints).

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:48 AM Aaron Bentley <aaron.bentley at canonical.com>
wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 2016-04-06 10:45 AM, Nate Finch wrote:
> > Wait, didn't destroy-environment --force fall back to the provider?
> > I thought that was the whole point of --force
>
> No, it didn't fall back.  It uses the provider unconditionally,
> without trying a normal destroy-controller first.
>
> Aaron
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
>
> iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXBSG5AAoJEK84cMOcf+9hzSQIAJ/vNKIa1/TnDSyvC2U9ApzW
> TAEvSqaEUw0ZL2dl2tiNKTp3JPzcnCR4VKrBIsh1xi0hB1UNtJR+IW4O46gRI6ok
> ZvA1cAvoJvRdmqf1ntNzYwHRSn/Tm82DGzixTPt0TcTn3KYrk13XpRJuxMbbvHDM
> LfYG0zglGmVKUaWs4rBogh4H4OaiOIR8lORXSC8GRQjA1/C4c+FjIg+KeW5Yw2Ti
> XnG87BPyJ1TtPGWxxeKAk4tnkZwnZKtJOnHU/IfvTFOpECdBjojWnnc6VbQ1um0H
> WwjR6EcA4qxkkhND6ypIGkt9A4k3ZZvckCau52EgIn3pnwhk5OSw64MURJAEmn0=
> =vm/H
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/20160406/f5f27197/attachment.html>