Will Cloudsigma be fully supported?

[Aaron Bentley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

I think that makes sense.

I don't think that there was ever much risk to non-cloudsigma users.
I assume the reason for flagging it was to let people test it without
asserting it was production-quality.  But everyone's had plenty of
time to test it now.

Aaron

On 2015-09-02 05:36 AM, John Meinel wrote:
> I would think it is something that doesn't interfere with other 
> providers. Thus if someone is using cloud sigma then they are using
> that provider, but otherwise it isn't in the way. So we can just
> drop the feature flag without impacting others.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> John =:->
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Aaron Bentley 
> <aaron.bentley at canonical.com <mailto:aaron.bentley at canonical.com>>
> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I notice that cloudsigma is still behind a feature flag in master,
> as of revision-build 3024.  So far, it has been feature-flagged in
> both 1.24 and 1.25.  Is there a plan to promote it to
> fully-supported, without the need for a flag?
> 
> Aaron
> 
> -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
> <mailto:Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com> Modify settings or unsubscribe
> at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJV5wCmAAoJEK84cMOcf+9hfgIIAJVSUavYNiJhOI79oV3g9AVI
ALG6F4tGCcpuPYFO2UdZAZhm/S+DLh1z5kzPcKFYZwa/BZzaXLBKukCFFw1yz3Go
aEFUAWSQqQThVsYTQDzV2R0axtQyNbr2jtZIg3ZvxewTqEvaTMea/L9hiJLSa7V8
t/kfvdcBrPiftm2MfTmicBhSpq2dSKyxRyFaL20EoU5MNlH79lZwJaYyDR8PQEKe
MhdIW+S7ssZF8ZWjSvAl5D61twLmAdQj3Cz42D4OoU+Yo+URsD4c1mDo+ii6LBMu
QkSqFCFT31QhC/szYasC+F120R4CvC8YijHVotidk8CafoS+3KaE5+fqCEoHkek=
=1YDc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----