Do not land code on blocked branches

Richard Harding rick.harding at canonical.com
Sun May 3 11:59:12 UTC 2015


On Sun, 03 May 2015, Ian Booth wrote:

> >
> > Curtis has filed three new bugs for these so far, and there appears to
> > be one or two more to come:
> >
> > <https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1450912>
>
> The issue here is that quickstart is relying on Juju 1.16 behaviour. There was a
> block of code with a comment:
>
> // Remove this whole if block when 1.16 compatibility is dropped.
>
> The code block was removed because 1.18 was our minimum compatibility version.
> But it seems we have to restore the 1.16 behaviour. Note that this is not an
> upgraded environment where we need to retain compatibility with older
> deployments. It is a fresh 1.24 install which should be able to rely on 1.18 and
> later behaviour only.

Ian, can you be more specific on the chunk of code that was removed or
branch I can look at for this? I'll happily file a bug and update
quickstart, we just need to know what's changed there. Having a branch in
hand or a bug will assist us in getting that updated as fast as possible.

In searching through the quickstart code there's no hard requirement or
notes on 1.16.

Thanks

--

Rick Harding

Juju UI Engineering
https://launchpad.net/~rharding
@mitechie



More information about the Juju-dev mailing list