Rule #2 should die

[Aaron Bentley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2015-06-04 11:41 PM, John Meinel wrote:
> Could it just be a lower priority catch-all rule and have the
> other rules evaluated first? It does seem useful to have a backstop
> against bad behavior when we introduce a new failure method that
> didn't get caught.

Actually, a too-generic match means that a more specific one is
unlikely to be found, because it won't be listed on our "unknown
outcomes" page:

http://reports.vapour.ws/releases/unknown-outcome

So I would rather just rip out the rule or dramatically reduce its scope.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVcavQAAoJEK84cMOcf+9hRIoH/0C7ghhQrXR3p8Mvd7aDTWMH
HXGQyjAAAbS3L4WyIX2LQLBdsGTjNYRa7oeJ4fPrIVEL8QsBCthiFay0z6SvQD0T
PbKsvYLhKphBpOvqjzPVIhMh7pPOvGwBUvH8jeAJp4iPZfUsKz461ebO44N/fyq3
/L9rHntplMuNhOgw4Eu/mYZnP015Cl+Ovvhsw1PXmevWm1o+YVuUtv1v3zBGGvN1
vJT5D3YDDzW0NaKQWwJ8FLkuYxFLUNo46HcCNeJ+aB+FGvuwPjO6N4PlKsWVdHUg
D+Z2uNxT13n0ojFsRdNOTXhMPY01sZbfBeVmJFmxlb5+zPqaDRZXVmUPrp3r07U=
=MQxa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----