Bleeding edge testers - do you want to try some new Juju Health/Status functionality?

[Marco Ceppi]

Whew, because I was about to raise some serious concern over conflating
namespaces >:D

On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Ian Booth <ian.booth at canonical.com> wrote:

> Ah, yes, of course. Typo, sorry.
>
> On 02/04/15 20:19, John Meinel wrote:
> > ...
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Hook tools
> >> ----------
> >>
> >> juju-set, used to inform Juju or a charm's workload status
> >> eg
> >>   juju-set <maintenance | waiting | blocked | active> [message]
> >>
> >> juju-get, used to return the current workload status
> >>
> >
> > I'm guessing you mean "status-set" and "status-get" here, rather than
> > "juju-get" and "juju-set" ?
> >
> > John
> > =:->
> >
>
> --
> canonical-juju mailing list
> canonical-juju at lists.canonical.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.canonical.com/mailman/listinfo/canonical-juju
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/20150402/159443f5/attachment.html>