Juju landing tests - good news

Ian Booth ian.booth at canonical.com
Thu Sep 11 07:18:45 UTC 2014


I forgot to say, over the next day or so, as we get more landings to look at,
I'll be going through and editing the document sent out previously, plus marking
bugs as closed if it appears the root cause has been fixed.

On 11/09/14 17:15, Ian Booth wrote:
> Hi folks
> 
> It's been a fantastic effort so far improving the quality of our tests; so much
> so that this time yesterday I switched off the retry flag. This means that our
> landing tests run at full speed, and fail first time if there's an error.
> 
> Since the change, I've seen a few failures due to glitches in AWS which hosts
> the instance used to run the tests. I've seen a few failures which appear
> legitimate due to env vars not being cleaned up (need to dig a bit more). And I
> think I've seen one intermittent failure in everyone's favourite package jujud.
> 
> So, all in all, things are a *lot* better thanks to everyone's efforts. Landings
> will now be much faster. We're still not quite there, but a lot closer than we were.
> 



More information about the Juju-dev mailing list