Actions :: UUID vs. Tag on command line

[Gustavo Niemeyer]

Both of these assumptions are incorrect. Please do not assume there's a
single person managing an environment, and the fact the sequence is
generated outside of the transaction that adds the action is a proof that
actions will be arbitrarily executed rather than in the sequence suggested
by the numbers.

On Fri Oct 24 2014 at 4:21:30 PM John Weldon <johnweldon4 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Forgot to reply-all
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: John Weldon <johnweldon4 at gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:19 AM
> Subject: Re: Actions :: UUID vs. Tag on command line
> To: Gustavo Niemeyer <gustavo.niemeyer at canonical.com>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Gustavo Niemeyer <
> gustavo.niemeyer at canonical.com> wrote:
>
>> I doubt this would work. There's no way in the transaction package for
>> you to generate an id and reference that same id in other fields in one go.
>>
>> In other cases that's not an issue, but having a sequence of numbered
>> actions where 10 is applied before 9 would be awkward.
>>
>
>
> Interesting.
>
> 1. The sequence is generated in a separate transaction before being used.
> (state/sequence.go)  So I don't think your concern about obtaining and
> using in one transaction will be an issue.
> 2. We have not had much discussion around strict ordering of actions being
> run in the order they were queued.  My impression is that two different
> users interacting with the system at the same time is a bit of an edge case.
>
> --
> John Weldon
>
> --
> Juju-dev mailing list
> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/
> mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/20141024/d9fc9f62/attachment.html>