[Canonical-juju-qa] Cursed (final): #1173 lp:juju-core r2511 (manual-deploy)

Matt Bruzek matthew.bruzek at canonical.com
Mon Mar 31 14:13:02 UTC 2014


Curtis,

Did the level of Apache change recently on precise?  I saw a problem with
web based charms on the power system because the version of apache2 changed
on trusty and web pages were not enabled properly.  According to the logs
you are using precise, so it may not be the same thing, but something to
consider.


   - Matt


On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Curtis Hovey-Canonical <
curtis at canonical.com> wrote:

> Juju CI has failed r2511 thought r2514.Trunk appears to be broken,
> though CI could also be at fault.
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1300207
>
> The tests show that the wordpress charm failed to present a web page.
> Juju status reports there was nothing wrong with juju or the charm. We
> have no logs for the failure.
>
> Aaron will capture some logs of what is wrong and investigate issues
> with CI. Can someone investigate Juju?
>
> Juju 1.18.0 will be based on r2510 if this bug is not fixed in time.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>
> Build: #1173 Revision: lp:juju-core r2511 Version: 1.17.8
>
> Failed tests
> manual-deploy build #210
>
> http://ec2-54-84-137-170.compute-1.amazonaws.com:8080/job/manual-deploy/210/console
>
>
>
> --
> Curtis Hovey
> Canonical Cloud Development and Operations
> http://launchpad.net/~sinzui
>
> --
> Juju-dev mailing list
> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/20140331/ea0fd41d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Juju-dev mailing list