no log tests

roger peppe rogpeppe at gmail.com
Wed Mar 26 21:21:19 UTC 2014


Alternatively you can run the tests with -juju.log ERROR (sent from my
phone so unable to double check the extact syntax)
On 26 Mar 2014 19:00, "Z. Nate Finch" <nate.finch at canonical.com> wrote:

> So, I often get failed tests that are so obscured by our log output that I
> can't even tell what's failing.  So I made a little thing to filter out the
> logs.  Yes, I'm sure you could do this with some bash stuff or grep or
> whatever, but I'll write bash when my job or my life depends on it, and not
> before.
>
> just do
>
> go get github.com/natefinch/nolog
>
> And then you can run nolog instead of go test.  It passes arguments
> through, so you can do
>
> nolog ./... -gocheck.v
>
> (or whatever)
> and it'll output everything except the lines that start with [LOG], which
> makes it a lot easier to see
>
> The filtering is really dumb, it just filters out lines that start with
> [LOG], but it seems to work fine for my needs.
>
> -Nate
>
> --
> Juju-dev mailing list
> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/20140326/d7e39cde/attachment.html>


More information about the Juju-dev mailing list