Reviewing in progress work on Github

Andrew Wilkins andrew.wilkins at canonical.com
Fri Jun 6 00:06:55 UTC 2014


On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:26 PM, roger peppe <rogpeppe at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 5 June 2014 14:22, Andrew Wilkins <andrew.wilkins at canonical.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:02 PM, roger peppe <rogpeppe at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 5 June 2014 05:07, Menno Smits <menno.smits at canonical.com> wrote:
> >> > One nice feature is that old comments are hidden
> >> > if the area of the code they reference is changed by a later diff.
> >>
> >> I consider this a serious shortcoming. I generally want to see all the
> >> conversation for a given code review. Is it possible to reveal
> >> the old comments somehow?
> >
> >
> > See the comment history on: https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/8
> >
> > - I proposed, and jam made some comments
> > - I addressed the comments in a new commit, rebased and squashed it into
> the
> > old, and did a "git push -f"
> >
> > There's now a "jameinel commented on an outdated diff". Click on "Show
> > outdated diff" to the right, and you can see the old comments.
> >
> > (I was under the impression that old comments got dropped altogether
> after
> > rebase. Not sure if behaviour in GitHub changed at some point, or if it
> was
> > always like this...)
>
> Ah, that's better than I thought, thanks.
>
> Is there a straightforward way of seeing the changes made in response
> to a particular I(outdated) comment? That's something I did almost every
> time in Rietveldt.
>

Not AFAIK. I miss this too.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/20140606/1efeea93/attachment.html>


More information about the Juju-dev mailing list