naming repos on github

[Andrew Wilkins]

On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:28 PM, roger peppe <rogpeppe at gmail.com> wrote:

> Unfortunately that means that the import identifier isn't intuitive,
> but perhaps that's ok.


It's not so different from the "go-thing" convention a lot of people use,
where the package name is actually just "thing".
If we were to change it to anything, I'd probably go with juju-.

On 5 June 2014 14:27, roger peppe <rogpeppe at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 5 June 2014 14:20, Nate Finch <nate.finch at canonical.com> wrote:
> >> We're making a lot of standalone repos on github so that teams external
> to
> >> core can reuse core's code.
> >> I think we need to disambiguate between repos that are generally only
> of use
> >> when working with juju, and repos that are more general purpose.  For
> >> example, errgo is a general use package that anyone else could use.
> >> However, there are some pretty vague packages under juju that are really
> >> juju only, such as the names package.
> >>
> >> If anyone has a good idea of how to disambiguate the two, I think it
> would
> >> be really useful, so we can point people to all the reusable code that's
> >> getting produced by Juju.
> >
> > Perhaps "juju-*"?
> >
> > e.g.
> > github.com/juju/juju-names.
>
> --
> Juju-dev mailing list
> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/20140606/49fa74fc/attachment.html>