backup API in 1.20

[Eric Snow]

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:12 AM, William Reade
<william.reade at canonical.com> wrote:
> Given that we explicitly flagged the POST API as experimental, and we didn't
> release a client that actually used it, I think we're safe fixing and
> backporting (although, remember, the 1.18-based backup/restore needs to
> continue to work -- this lets us handle only *two* mechanisms rather than
> three, it doesn't let us use just one).

Only the state API would be affected.  The existing backup/restore are
currently implemented as command plugin scripts and have no
relationship with the backup state API.

-eric