Charm store API proposal, new version

[Aaron Bentley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 14-07-15 10:17 AM, roger peppe wrote:
> The most significant change is that all endpoints refer just to a
> single charm or bundle, rather than being "bulk" calls as they were
> before.

That sounds like the opposite of what juju-reports wants.  Does it
really mean that we would need to make N requests to retrieve info on
N charms?  What was the reason for changing this?

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTxT04AAoJEK84cMOcf+9hTY4IALfbWrq6VydINsAzHha6Az1+
RhtpJpS74VBbnBSzFK3LgeHk1uLGLNa73VklKYqibKcSHe6TPUhfwpSldxHoSrXR
KGq86SdjojCnFXMxUw1QBXqd4QXv6h19znO89AwgDK8Crw14IB3ZrQvmfNbyZWex
WmJjlgtvcuImVLrzBntF1UQcHzzz5ycXI2nzzhVEGTlD+z2Eg+8SfSoagbMuZ6Zv
q4I0gNEJcktnoHoYGYvx98umN57td5nj9u9R79c500ZQz7kIE7f4y07Hy7MxK714
gEzoFo4rnbgZJBCdoI3FiH4BqxP5uzWoj2iAG9UiMlPN6nFZUsJnZKjjcvS+nvM=
=6gFz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----