Juju induction sprint summary

Mark Ramm-Christensen (Canonical.com) mark.ramm-christensen at canonical.com
Mon Jul 14 15:24:57 UTC 2014


Great work,

I am particularly happy to see that we have an incremental, and useful plan
to take care of some of the technical debt in state.State.   This is the
classic form of technical debt as described by Ward Cunningham -- we have
learned a good bit about the problem space and where flexibility is needed
since the code was originally written and the way we would do it today is
different than the best way we knew how to build it two years ago.

--Mark Ramm


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Ian Booth <ian.booth at canonical.com> wrote:

> Hi all
>
> So last week we had a Juju induction sprint for Tanzanite and Moonstone
> teams to
> welcome Eric and Katherine to the Juju fold. Following is a summary of
> some key
> outcomes from the sprint that are relevant to others working on Juju (we
> also
> did other stuff not generally applicable for this email). Some items will
> interest some folks, while others may not quite be so relevant to you, so
> scan
> the topics to see what you find interesting.
>
> * Architectural overview - and a cool new tool
>
> The sprint started with an architectural overview of the Juju moving parts
> and
> how they interacted to deploy and maintain a Juju environment. Katherine
> noted
> that our in-tree documentation has lots of text and no diagrams. She
> pointed out
> a great tool for easily putting together UML diagrams using a simple text
> based
> syntax - Plant UML http://plantuml.sourceforge.net. Check it out, it's
> pretty
> cool. We'll be adding a diagram or two to the in-tree docs to show how it
> works.
>
> * Code review (replacement for Github's native code review)
>
> We are going to use Review Board. When we first looked at it before the
> sprint,
> a major show stopper was lack of an auth plugin which worked with Github.
> Eric
> has stepped up and written the necessary plugin. We'll have something
> deployed
> this week or early next week, once some more tooling to finish the Github
> integration is done. The key features:
> - Login with Github button on main login screen
> - pull requests automatically imported to Review Board and added to review
> queue
> - diffs can be uploaded to Review Board as WIP and submitted to Github when
> finalised
>
> * Fixing the Juju state.State mess
>
> state is a mess of layering violations and intermingled concerns. The
> result is
> slow and fragile unit tests, scalability issues, hard to understand code,
> code
> which is difficult to extend and refactor (to name a few issues).
>
> The correct layering should be something like:
> * remote service interface (aka apiserver)
> * juju services for managing machines, services, units etc
> * juju domain model
> * model persistence (aka state)
>
> The persistence layer above is all that should be in the state package.
> The plan
> is to incrementally extract Juju service business logic out of state and
> pull it
> up into a services layer. The first to be done is the machine placement and
> deployment logic. Wayne has a WIP branch for this. The benefit of this work
> can't be overstated, and the sprint allowed both teams to be able to work
> together to understand the direction and intent of the work.
>
> * Mongo 2.6 support
>
> The work to port Juju to Mongo 2.6 is pretty much complete. The newer Mongo
> version offers a number of bug fixes and  improvements over the 2.4
> series, and
> we need to be able to run with an up-to-date version.
>
> * Providers don't need to have a storage implementation (almost)
>
> A significant chunk of old code which was to support agents connecting
> directly
> to mongo was removed (along with the necessary refactoring). This then
> allowed
> the Environ interface to drop the StateInfo() method and instead implement
> a
> method which returns the state server instances (not committed yet but
> close).
> The next step is to remove the Storage() interface from Environ and make
> storage
> an internal implementation detail which is not mandatory, so long as
> providers
> have a way to figure out their state servers (this can be done using
> tagging for
> example).
>
> * Juju 1.20.1 release (aka juju/mongo issues)
>
> A number of issues with how Juju and mongo interact became apparent when
> replicasets were used for HA. Unfortunately Juju 1.20 shipped with these
> issues
> unfixed. Part of the sprint was spent working on some urgent fixes to ship
> a bug
> fix 1.20.1 release. There's still an outstanding mongo session issue that
> needs
> to be fixed this week for a 1.20.2 release. Michael is working on it. The
> tl;dr
> is that we are holding onto sessions and not refreshing, which means that
> the
> underlying socket can time out and Juju loses connection to mongo.
>
> * Add support for Juju in China for Amazon (almost)
>
> The supported regions for the EC2 provider are hard coded and so new
> regions in
> China were not supported. The Chinese regions also use a new signing
> algorithm.
> There should be a fix in place this week. Since all the changes are in the
> goamz
> library, the change to juju-core is merely a dependency update. So this
> feature
> should be available in the 1.20.2 release.
>
> All up, a productive sprint with some great collaboration between the two
> teams.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Juju-dev mailing list
> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/20140714/cd219659/attachment.html>


More information about the Juju-dev mailing list