separating out golang juju client from

[Nate Finch]

While I am generally for using more permissive licenses, I'm not sure how
useful that might be... most significant changes require modifications to
both the client and the server, or at least to libraries used by both.
There's not that much code under cmd/juju compared to the whole rest of the
repo.

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Kapil Thangavelu <
kapil.thangavelu at canonical.com> wrote:
>
> one of the issues with having it in tree, means client usage falls under
> the AGPL. We want to have the client used widely under a more permissive
> license. I've already had contributions to other projects n'acked due to
> license on our libraries. I'd like to see it moved to a separate repo so
> that's possible. Thoughts?
>
> cheers,
> Kapil
>
>
>
> --
> Juju-dev mailing list
> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/20141219/61f5ae96/attachment.html>