First customer pain point pull request - default-hook

[Tim Penhey]

On 21/08/14 02:50, Nate Finch wrote:
> I would expect a lot of people will implement their charms as a single
> script (especially given the number of charms we've seen implemented
> that way even with minimal support for it).  If the special hook file is
> called "default-hook", it makes those single-script charms seem like
> less of a hack than if the single file is called "missing-hook".  It
> would also makes more sense to a new charm author, I think.  

+1 to default-hook
-1 to missing-hook

As Aaron mentioned, it isn't missing if it is there.

I agree that default-hook is more likely to make sense to newcomers.

Tim