status of container support in Juju
Richard Harding
rick.harding at canonical.com
Tue Aug 19 14:56:10 UTC 2014
Thanks for the correction. You're right, in the testing we were checking
expose directly. We also did a test (not in this script) around two
services where one was on the root and one was in a container, but even
that's not a fair case of 'routable' as that might work while two units on
different machines would not.
We'll update and do some more testing.
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, John Meinel wrote:
> "expose" is different because it is about making the service available
> outside of the cloud. The issue with route able containers is that they
> aren't route able even within the cloud.
> At this point only MaaS has route able containers.
>
> John
> =:->
> On Aug 19, 2014 4:56 PM, "Richard Harding" <rick.harding at canonical.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Richard Harding wrote:
> >
> > > Right now I'm hesitant to enable creating containers in Machine View for
> > > anything but MAAS.
> >
> > Just to clarify, after having some more coffee we can warn users that
> > expose services that have units in containers in the GUI and it should help
> > raise warning to users about the routing issues for now. It's after the
> > user has set things up, but it should allow us to allow containers in most
> > providers.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Rick
> >
> >
> > --
> > Juju-dev mailing list
> > Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
> > Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
> >
More information about the Juju-dev
mailing list