Fixing backup and restore
Curtis Hovey-Canonical
curtis at canonical.com
Thu Apr 17 14:20:57 UTC 2014
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:03 AM, John Meinel <john at arbash-meinel.com> wrote:
> So backup and restore in its original incarnation was just writing down in a
> set of scripts what we were performing at the time to make backup/restore
> work at a given site. They were a bit hackish to start with.
...
> The question is whether it is worth scheduling the time to do it properly,
> vs trying to continue patching up the existing work.
I would choose the fastest path to make the test pass. If we have a
hack that that passes CI, then we are in a position to revise and
replace code without introducing more regressions.
My only complaint about juju-backup is that it doesn't except the -e
flag like other commands. I can add that myself.
--
Curtis Hovey
Canonical Cloud Development and Operations
http://launchpad.net/~sinzui
More information about the Juju-dev
mailing list