Local provider broken (AGAIN) in 1.16
Nate Finch
nate.finch at canonical.com
Thu Oct 17 01:23:57 UTC 2013
That was my suggestion as well. I think it's worth almost any hassle
especially since it can allow many more extensive system tests... Basically
testing everything outside the other providers in a real system.
On Oct 16, 2013 7:16 PM, "Mark Canonical Ramm-Christensen" <
mark.ramm-christensen at canonical.com> wrote:
> Now that we have local provider can we do some live tests against it in
> Tarmac to gate commits?
>
> On Wednesday, October 16, 2013, Tim Penhey wrote:
>
>> I have filed a critical bug and will start on it right now.
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1240709
>>
>> Please, when you change stuff in bootstrap, test the local provider.
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> --
>> Juju-dev mailing list
>> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
>>
>
>
> --
> --Mark Ramm (mobile edition)
>
> --
> Juju-dev mailing list
> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/20131016/1f9b11e9/attachment.html>
More information about the Juju-dev
mailing list