access a unit running in an lxc

[Mike Sam]

Thanks for expanding on it. Vpc is great for production, but during development, it makes accessing/managing things somehow more involved which can add friction to the process in larger dev teams


On Oct 7, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Kapil Thangavelu <kapil.thangavelu at canonical.com> wrote:

> I expanded on this in a separate email, but perhaps the real question is what's wrong with vpc usage in ec2?
> 
> -k
> 
> 
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Mike Sam <mikesam460 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Could you please elaborate as to why more specifically? 
>> 
>> Also anything we can do within the charm to do this?  
>> 
>> On Oct 7, 2013, at 9:46 AM, Kapil Thangavelu <kapil.thangavelu at canonical.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Theoretically yes, in juju probably not.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Mike Sam <mikesam460 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Sure, no worries, thank you for clarifying this. 
>>>> 
>>>> I am curious, in terms of lxc work on general ec2 and not vpc, is this going to be doable at all?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Oct 7, 2013, at 1:43 AM, William Reade <william.reade at canonical.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Mike
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm sorry, it looks like we never hooked up the early validation that would have told you it wouldn't work right now. It's my fault -- it languished in review a bit, and I didn't think through the consequences of leaving it out. At the moment containerization only works against the MAAS provider.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> William
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Mike Sam <mikesam460 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>  the command
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> juju deploy --to lxc:1
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> on 1.15.1 worked for me and the lxc is running on the machine when I ssh to it but did not check if the actual unit has been deployed on it or not. Are you saying the accessibility is not supported yet?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Oct 7, 2013, at 12:49 AM, John Arbash Meinel <john at arbash-meinel.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>> > Hash: SHA1
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On 2013-10-07 11:47, Mike Sam wrote:
>>>>>> >> Thanks. This is actually for when I have deployed a unit on ec2
>>>>>> >> machine but within a new lxc on that machine so not for local. Does
>>>>>> >> this still apply? I am not quite sure how these network bridges
>>>>>> >> need to be configured so if anybody is familiar with their setup
>>>>>> >> and how to access the units within them through the machine public
>>>>>> >> ip, I would really appreciate that.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > We don't currently support using an LXC on EC2 because we don't have a
>>>>>> > way to route to the LXC machine. We are looking to add support with
>>>>>> > VPC to allow you to request an IP address for the LXC container.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > John
>>>>>> > =:->
>>>>>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>>> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (Cygwin)
>>>>>> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > iEYEARECAAYFAlJSZ3oACgkQJdeBCYSNAAOjTwCgqxLMn5YldsauJ4WpfrtODTZ5
>>>>>> > 3HwAnjtUhtQ9zUKvJLgtDNYw9Io0Ev+r
>>>>>> > =g0jC
>>>>>> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Juju-dev mailing list
>>>>>> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
>>>>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Juju-dev mailing list
>>>> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
>>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/20131007/11ae30af/attachment.html>