Proliferation of small packages

[John Arbash Meinel]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2013-05-30 10:08, David Cheney wrote:
> I don't see how reusability requires splitting everything out into
> a host of tiny little packages.
> 
> Dave (who is still upset about having not one, but a namespace of
> utils packages)
> 

Can you give concrete examples of how you think it could look, rather
than just saying you don't like what exists today?

John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlGm7YcACgkQJdeBCYSNAANVFgCgqTd08ODYNdeV/WDk1kfvEUDY
rI0AoNACbkTH5qRgQr8BB8AMblcmSpSt
=uNQu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----