Building juju-core on Windows

Gustavo Niemeyer gustavo.niemeyer at canonical.com
Wed Mar 13 15:09:31 UTC 2013


On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:58 AM, John Arbash Meinel
<john at arbash-meinel.com> wrote:
> Well the tools I got from golang.org were 64-bit binaries. And I know
> in the past go's support for 32-bit was pretty poor. (The memory
> allocator has a hard time freeing memory that isn't referenced because
> the pointer values aren't as unique.)
>
> Certainly I would say we don't need >2GB of memory for Juju, but the
> general go tool support seems better for 64-bit.

The original problem was blown slightly out of proportion, but even
then tip carries a precise GC these days, so 32-bit is no problem.


gustavo @ http://niemeyer.net



More information about the Juju-dev mailing list