More failing tests...

[William Reade]

On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 10:11 +1000, Julian Edwards wrote:
> On 28/02/13 20:41, William Reade wrote:
> > If you see a failure and believe it's intermittent, please run it again
> > until you're sure it is, and make sure there's a bug for it.
> 
> The Launchpad process for this situation was to see if you could
> trivially fix it, otherwise you file a critical bug and disable the test
> immediately and move on.  The rationale being that intermittently
> failing tests are worse than no test.
> 
> Cheers
> J

I'm pretty comfortable adopting this process. Can anyone think of any
arguments against it?