What is happening with the 1.11.2 (nee 1.11.1) release
James Page
james.page at canonical.com
Wed Jul 3 09:33:57 UTC 2013
On 03/07/13 10:24, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
>> OK - 1.1.1 is stuck in Debian NEW as the maintainer has enabled a
>> >load of cross archive compiler packages (not sure if they are
>> >useful for juju-core or not - they include windows and other
>> >packages).
>> >
>> >I'll pull this direct from the Debian VCS and stick it in a PPA
>> >for
>>> >>= 12.04 so we can get some early exposure to it and use it for
>> >the juju-core build toolchain.
>> >
>> >Does that make sense?
> Sounds reasonable to me. The big question is whether there will be a
> chance-in-hell of getting 1.1.1 into P for official "juju" (the
> client) builds.
Well if we can sort-out backports then maybe.
> I could live with "use this stable PPA to run juju-the-client on P,
> though".
Yeah - thats the short-term/fallback plan anyway.
> Once you have it working, I'm pretty sure this:
> https://launchpad.net/~juju/+archive/devel
>
> Is where we would like to get go-1.1.1 into.
>
> Though we might start with:
> https://launchpad.net/~juju/+archive/experimental
>
> In PPA builds, can you depend on another PPA for build-time packages,
> or does it have to be built in the PPA you are building from?
That is possible so we could have a separate toolchain PPA that all the
other PPA's depend on.
--
James Page
Technical Lead
Ubuntu Server Team
james.page at canonical.com
More information about the Juju-dev
mailing list