VERY IMPORTANT: can all juju-core devs please report their Go version to me

[David Cheney]

That is the same version and series that I used and built a version of juju
1.11.2 that could not talk to ec2 reliably. Does it bootstrap for you ?


On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Tim Penhey <tim.penhey at canonical.com> wrote:

> On 03/07/13 17:31, David Cheney wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've been able to reproduce the PPA build failure that is blocking the
> > juju-core 1.11.2 release using the raring Go version.
> >
> > lucky(~/src/launchpad.net/juju-core <http://launchpad.net/juju-core>) %
> > go version
> > go version go1.0.2
> > lucky(~/src/launchpad.net/juju-core <http://launchpad.net/juju-core>) %
> > which go
> > /usr/bin/go
> >
> > The next question is, why haven't we hit this before.
> >
> > I need to know what people are using for their local Go install ?
> >
> > Gustavo's PPA ?
> > Tarball from upstream ?
> > Compile from source ?
> > Something else ?
> >
> > _please_ let me know what you are using in as much detail as possible.
>
> $ apt-cache policy golang
> golang:
>   Installed: 2:1.0.2-2
>   Candidate: 2:1.0.2-2
>   Version table:
>  *** 2:1.0.2-2 0
>         500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ raring/universe amd64
> Packages
>         100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
>
> $ go version
> go version go1.0.2
>
> That is what I use.
>
> Tim
>
>
> --
> Juju-dev mailing list
> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/20130703/bddacb4c/attachment.html>