constraints

[Gustavo Niemeyer]

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:04 AM, roger peppe <rogpeppe at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm probably being stupid here, but it doesn't seem *that* straightforward
> to me. If we can express an instance type as a set of non-provider-specific

I'm the one lost. Where is the difficulty in knowing that m1.small has
X amount of memory and comparing that to the Y which was provided to
mem?

> That means that people need to know which other constraints
> are implied by any particular provider-specific attribute,

They certainly must know what other constraints exist to know what is
going to be selected. It's no different from providing a cpu=1 when
mem=16GB is in the default settings.


gustavo @ http://niemeyer.net