Review Process Experiment (1 LGTM)

[David Cheney]

1) Only one LGTM needed to land code.

>
>    a) This raises the stakes slightly on actually voting LGTM. We'd
>       like it to mean "I understand this patch enough that if there was
>       a problem, I would be responsible for it."
>

SGTM. This is how we do it on Go, you and the reviewer are both on the hook
if you cause a regression.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/20130819/6f1c855e/attachment.html>