charm audit summary
William Reade
william.reade at canonical.com
Tue Oct 16 11:03:31 UTC 2012
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 21:25 +1100, David Cheney wrote:
> ± 1 on one container agent per machine, if only because it blurs the demarcation line between itself and the machine agent.
Sorry, I think I was unclear: that's one agent per machine and one agent
per container. I don't think the line is blurred -- the fact that
there's currently one of each per machine is a consequence of lack of
containerization. We should ofc be careful to continue to parcel out
responsibilities appropriately.
More information about the Juju-dev
mailing list