[Canonical-tech] Handling active dependencies in Go
John Arbash Meinel
john.meinel at canonical.com
Tue Dec 18 13:10:07 UTC 2012
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-12-18 15:53, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:03 AM, John Arbash Meinel
> <john.meinel at canonical.com> wrote:
>
>> Eg, we recently had a discussion about whether functions should
>> return structs or pointers to structs. Once that is settled, it
>> would be good to update most APIs to be consistent with that.
>
> Unrelated to the topic of this thread, but please could you give
> pointers to that discussion? I'd be interested in reading it, and
> check the outcome too.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Free
>
This just came up on one of the code reviews. It wasn't something that
was a big thread. Just an api that was returning "foo Foo" and it
seemed better to return "foo *Foo".
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlDQay8ACgkQJdeBCYSNAANBhwCgovcKq1/Qk304AjOdAwqEjrlb
4uIAn3jk0eMAwO2Wvz2XC+MSia7/iD9b
=+VVZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Juju-dev
mailing list