open question: should the methods on juju.Conn take a string or a type

[William Reade]

On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 21:49 +1000, David Cheney wrote:
> Maybe as a proof of concept I should try removing conn.State() from the public API, and move it into export_test, and see what breaks. 

Hmm, but on reading niemeyer's reviews, it does look like I have not
correctly understood the intent :(. Sorry noise.

> 
> On Tuesday, 7 August 2012 at 9:48 PM, William Reade wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 21:47 +1000, David Cheney wrote:
> > > At the end of the day, if this leads to removing conn.State() from the public client API, I think this is a good thing. 
> > > 
> > > Thoughts ?
> > 
> > +1, per my understanding of the intent behind juju.Conn.
> > 
> > > 
> > > Cheers
> > > 
> > > Dave 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Juju-dev mailing list
> > Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com (mailto:Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com)
> > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
> 
> 
>