<div dir="ltr"><div style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif" class="gmail_default"></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">This likely the be the results of the below mismatch in DMAR and PCI device lists</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"> </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">== DMAR ==</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"> </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">[0D6h 0214 2] PCI Segment Number : 0001 [0D8h 0216 8] Register Base Address : 00000000E3FFC000 [0E0h 0224 1] Device Scope Type : 01 [PCI Endpoint Device] [0E1h 0225 1] Entry Length : 08 [0E2h 0226 2] Reserved : 0000 [0E4h 0228 1] Enumeration ID : 00 [0E5h 0229 1] PCI Bus Number : E7 [0E6h 0230 2] PCI Path : 01,00</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"> </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">This points to PCI device 0001h:E7h:01h.00h (note the PCI seg number is 1). However, there is no such a device in the lspci.log (do you mean "0000:e7:00.1 System peripheral [0880]: Intel Corporation Device [8086:09a4]"?).</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"> </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">This doesn't look like the only mismatched one. You can modify your ACPI BIOS and run the same test to verify. </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"> </div></div> <div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 3:02 AM Huang, Rachel <<a href="mailto:rachel.huang@hpe.com">rachel.huang@hpe.com</a>> wrote: </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> <div style="overflow-wrap: break-word;" lang="EN-GB"> <div class="gmail-m_2034438784030935513WordSection1"> Hi Alex and Bryan, Capture all of the result log including acpi/cpuinfo/dmesg/dmidcode/Ispci as attachment. BRs, Rachel <div style="border-color:rgb(225,225,225) currentcolor currentcolor;border-style:solid none none;border-width:1pt medium medium;padding:3pt 0cm 0cm"> From: Alex Hung <<a href="mailto:alex.hung@canonical.com" target="_blank">alex.hung@canonical.com</a>> Sent: 17 February 2022 03:57 To: Huang, Bryan <<a href="mailto:bryanhuang@hpe.com" target="_blank">bryanhuang@hpe.com</a>> Cc: <a href="mailto:fwts-devel@lists.ubuntu.com" target="_blank">fwts-devel@lists.ubuntu.com</a>; Chang, Alvin (HPE DVT UEFI) <<a href="mailto:achang@hpe.com" target="_blank">achang@hpe.com</a>>; Huang, Rachel <<a href="mailto:rachel.huang@hpe.com" target="_blank">rachel.huang@hpe.com</a>> Subject: Re: FW: FWTS- DMA Remapping (VT-d) test </div> <div> <div> Hi Bryan, </div> <div> </div> <div> This requires more log files, including acpidump.log, lspci.log and dmesg.log, for more analysis. These files can be generated by "sudo fwts --dump". If fwts-live is used, they should be available in the same directory of the results.log. </div> <div> </div> <div> Having said that, I would guess the target DMAR has declared a PCI device, 0001h:E7h:01h.00h, but it is not present in the system under test. Please have a look at your DMAR table and PCI list. </div> </div> <div> <div> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 6:13 AM Huang, Bryan <<a href="mailto:bryanhuang@hpe.com" target="_blank">bryanhuang@hpe.com</a>> wrote: </div> <blockquote style="border-color:currentcolor currentcolor currentcolor rgb(204,204,204);border-style:none none none solid;border-width:medium medium medium 1pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm"> <div> <div> Hi Alex and FWTS team members, Here is TPE HPE Bryan Huang. We ran DMA Remapping (VT-d) test and encountered the following FWTS issue as shown below. (The FWTS log is as attachment.) According to this result, we have no further information. Would you please help us to confirm it? <img style="width: 7.8125in; height: 1.1979in;" id="gmail-m_2034438784030935513gmail-m_-8337795240993553289_x005f_x0000_i1026" src="cid:17f0f7246094ce8e91" width="750" height="115" border="0"> Thanks. Best regards, Bryan <div> <div style="border-style:solid none none;border-width:1pt medium medium;padding:3pt 0cm 0cm;border-color:currentcolor"> From: Huang, Rachel Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 5:44 PM To: Huang, Bryan <<a href="mailto:bryanhuang@hpe.com" target="_blank">bryanhuang@hpe.com</a>> Cc: Chang, Alvin (HPE DVT UEFI) <<a href="mailto:achang@hpe.com" target="_blank">achang@hpe.com</a>> Subject: RE: FWTS- DMA Remapping (VT-d) test </div> </div> Hi Bryan, I’m going to start to test with DMA Remapping(VT-D) under FWTS test plan. Currently , check with the test result log and found one test fail while VT-D was enabled. Please review more detail as below: <img style="width: 5.9375in; height: 2.2083in;" id="gmail-m_2034438784030935513gmail-m_-8337795240993553289Picture_x0020_1" src="cid:17f0f72460a5b16b22" width="570" height="212" border="0"> BRs, Rachel </div> </div> </blockquote> </div> -- <div> <div> Cheers, Alex Hung </div> </div> </div> </div> </blockquote></div> -- <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">Cheers, Alex Hung </div></div>