[PATCH] acpi: einj: test more error injection actions for einjv2 (mantis 2287)
Ivan Hu
ivan.hu at canonical.com
Fri Dec 29 08:07:23 UTC 2023
BugLink:https://bugs.launchpad.net/fwts/+bug/2047212
Add more error injection actions EINJV2_SET_ERROR_TYPE and
EINJV2_GET_ERROR_TYPE for AVPI6.5
Signed-off-by: Ivan Hu <ivan.hu at canonical.com>
---
src/acpi/einj/einj.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/acpi/einj/einj.c b/src/acpi/einj/einj.c
index 7aae08b0..e52bd873 100644
--- a/src/acpi/einj/einj.c
+++ b/src/acpi/einj/einj.c
@@ -81,14 +81,26 @@ static int einj_test1(fwts_framework *fw)
fwts_log_info_verbatim(fw, " Mask : 0x%16.16"
PRIx64, entry->mask);
- if (entry->serialization_action > 0x9 &&
- entry->serialization_action != 0xFF) {
- fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
- "EINJBadInjectionAction",
- "EINJ Injection Action must be within 0~9 "
- "or 0xFF got 0x%" PRIx8 " instead",
- entry->serialization_action);
- passed = false;
+ if (einj->header.revision >= 2) {
+ if (entry->serialization_action > 0x11 &&
+ entry->serialization_action != 0xFF) {
+ fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
+ "EINJBadInjectionAction",
+ "EINJ Injection Action must be within 0~9 "
+ "or 0xFF got 0x%" PRIx8 " instead",
+ entry->serialization_action);
+ passed = false;
+ }
+ } else {
+ if (entry->serialization_action > 0x9 &&
+ entry->serialization_action != 0xFF) {
+ fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_MEDIUM,
+ "EINJBadInjectionAction",
+ "EINJ Injection Action must be within 0~9 "
+ "or 0xFF got 0x%" PRIx8 " instead",
+ entry->serialization_action);
+ passed = false;
+ }
}
if (entry->instruction > 0x4) {
--
2.34.1
More information about the fwts-devel
mailing list