[PATCH][V2] fwts_acpi_object_eval: add a function to check package

Colin Ian King colin.king at canonical.com
Tue May 26 17:13:02 UTC 2020


On 26/05/2020 18:09, Alex Hung wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 9:55 AM Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com
> <mailto:colin.king at canonical.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 25/05/2020 09:22, Alex Hung wrote:
>     > This function checks if all elements are integers in a returned
>     package.
>     > This is one of common forms returned by ACPI methods.
>     >
>     > Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung at canonical.com
>     <mailto:alex.hung at canonical.com>>
>     > ---
>     >  src/lib/include/fwts_acpi_object_eval.h |  1 +
>     >  src/lib/src/fwts_acpi_object_eval.c     | 29
>     +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>     >  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
>     >
>     > diff --git a/src/lib/include/fwts_acpi_object_eval.h
>     b/src/lib/include/fwts_acpi_object_eval.h
>     > index 09f3f754..92177857 100644
>     > --- a/src/lib/include/fwts_acpi_object_eval.h
>     > +++ b/src/lib/include/fwts_acpi_object_eval.h
>     > @@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ void
>     fwts_method_test_buffer_return(fwts_framework *fw, char *name,
>     ACPI_BUFFER
>     >  void fwts_method_test_all_reference_package_return(fwts_framework
>     *fw, char *name, ACPI_BUFFER *buf, ACPI_OBJECT *obj, void *private);
>     >  void fwts_method_test_integer_reserved_bits_return(fwts_framework
>     *fw, char *name, ACPI_BUFFER *buf, ACPI_OBJECT *obj, void *private);
>     >  void fwts_method_test_integer_max_return(fwts_framework *fw, char
>     *name, ACPI_BUFFER *buf, ACPI_OBJECT *obj, void *private);
>     > +void fwts_method_test_package_integer_return(fwts_framework *fw,
>     char *name, ACPI_BUFFER *buf, ACPI_OBJECT *obj, void *private);
>     >  void fwts_method_test_passed_failed_return(fwts_framework *fw,
>     char *name, ACPI_BUFFER *buf, ACPI_OBJECT *obj, void *private);
>     >  void fwts_method_test_polling_return( fwts_framework *fw, char
>     *name, ACPI_BUFFER *buf, ACPI_OBJECT *obj, void *private);
>>     > diff --git a/src/lib/src/fwts_acpi_object_eval.c
>     b/src/lib/src/fwts_acpi_object_eval.c
>     > index 1e3575c9..f8d22eb4 100644
>     > --- a/src/lib/src/fwts_acpi_object_eval.c
>     > +++ b/src/lib/src/fwts_acpi_object_eval.c
>     > @@ -881,6 +881,35 @@ void fwts_method_test_integer_max_return(
>     >               fwts_passed(fw, "%s correctly returned an integer.",
>     name);
>     >  }
>>     > +/*
>     > + *  fwts_method_test_package_integer_return
>     > + *   check if all integers in a returned package
>     > + */
>     > +void fwts_method_test_package_integer_return(
>     > +     fwts_framework *fw,
>     > +     char *name,
>     > +     ACPI_BUFFER *buf,
>     > +     ACPI_OBJECT *obj,
>     > +     void *private)
>     > +{
>     > +     char method[5];
>     > +     uint32_t *element_size = (uint32_t *) private;
>     > +
>     > +     memcpy(method, &name[strlen(name) - 4], 4);
>     > +     method[4] = '\0';
> 
>     I don't understand the memcpy, surely memcpy(method, name, 4) is fine?
> 
> 
> Only the device name is needed. For example, wWhen name =
> _SB.PCI0.LPCB.ABCD, only the ABCD is wanted.

Ah, OK. Just a sanity check question, but  will there be any occasion
where the suffix part of the name (e.g. ABCD) or the whole string itself
is less than 4 chars as I don't want to index off the front of a short
string.

Also,  name + strlen(name) - 4 is probably easier to comprehend than
&name[strlen(name() - 4] :-)

Colin
> 
>  
> 
> 
>     > +
>     > +     if (fwts_method_check_type(fw, name, buf, ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE)
>     != FWTS_OK)
>     > +             return;
>     > +
>     > +     if (fwts_method_package_count_equal(fw, name, method, obj,
>     *element_size) != FWTS_OK)
>     > +             return;
>     > +
>     > +     if (fwts_method_package_elements_all_type(fw, name, method,
>     obj, ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) != FWTS_OK)
>     > +             return;
>     > +
>     > +     fwts_method_passed_sane(fw, name, "package");
>     > +}
>     > +
>     >  /*
>     >   *  fwts_method_test_passed_failed_return
>     >   *   check if 0 or 1 (false/true) integer is returned
>     >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Alex Hung




More information about the fwts-devel mailing list