ACK: [PATCH 06/12] acpi: cstates: add whitespacing, use %d for int format specifiers
ivanhu
ivan.hu at canonical.com
Mon Sep 10 04:27:36 UTC 2018
On 09/06/2018 10:19 PM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
> ---
> src/acpi/cstates/cstates.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/acpi/cstates/cstates.c b/src/acpi/cstates/cstates.c
> index c654c277..40dc2657 100644
> --- a/src/acpi/cstates/cstates.c
> +++ b/src/acpi/cstates/cstates.c
> @@ -125,9 +125,9 @@ static void do_cpu(fwts_framework *fw, int nth, int cpus, int cpu, char *path)
> for (i = 0; (i < TOTAL_WAIT_TIME) && keepgoing; i++) {
> int j;
>
> - snprintf(buffer, sizeof(buffer),"(CPU %d of %d)", nth+1, cpus);
> + snprintf(buffer, sizeof(buffer),"(CPU %d of %d)", nth + 1, cpus);
> fwts_progress_message(fw,
> - 100 * (i+ (TOTAL_WAIT_TIME*nth))/
> + 100 * (i + (TOTAL_WAIT_TIME*nth)) /
> (cpus * TOTAL_WAIT_TIME), buffer);
>
> if ((i & 7) < 4)
> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static void do_cpu(fwts_framework *fw, int nth, int cpus, int cpu, char *path)
> fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_HIGH, "CPUFailedPerformance",
> "Could not determine the CPU performance, this "
> "may be due to not being able to get or set the "
> - "CPU affinity for CPU %i.", cpu);
> + "CPU affinity for CPU %d.", cpu);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -161,21 +161,21 @@ static void do_cpu(fwts_framework *fw, int nth, int cpus, int cpu, char *path)
> /* Not a failure, but not a pass either! */
> for (i = MIN_CSTATE; i < MAX_CSTATE; i++) {
> if (initial.present[i] && !initial.used[i]) {
> - snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "C%i ", i);
> + snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "C%d ", i);
> strcat(buffer, tmp);
> }
> }
> - fwts_log_info(fw, "Processor %i has not reached %s during tests. "
> + fwts_log_info(fw, "Processor %d has not reached %s during tests. "
> "This is not a failure, however it is not a "
> "complete and thorough test.", cpu, buffer);
> } else {
> for (i = MIN_CSTATE; i < MAX_CSTATE; i++) {
> if (initial.present[i] && initial.used[i]) {
> - snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "C%i ", i);
> + snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "C%d ", i);
> strcat(buffer, tmp);
> }
> }
> - fwts_passed(fw, "Processor %i has reached all C-states: %s",
> + fwts_passed(fw, "Processor %d has reached all C-states: %s",
> cpu, buffer);
> }
>
> @@ -189,13 +189,14 @@ static void do_cpu(fwts_framework *fw, int nth, int cpus, int cpu, char *path)
>
> if (statecount != count)
> fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_HIGH, "CPUNoCState",
> - "Processor %i is expected to have %i C-states but has %i.",
> + "Processor %d is expected to have %d C-states but has %d.",
> cpu, statecount, count);
> else
> if (firstcpu == -1)
> firstcpu = cpu;
> else
> - fwts_passed(fw, "Processor %i has the same number of C-states as processor %d", cpu, firstcpu);
> + fwts_passed(fw, "Processor %d has the same number of C-states as processor %d",
> + cpu, firstcpu);
> }
>
> static int cstates_test1(fwts_framework *fw)
> @@ -217,7 +218,7 @@ static int cstates_test1(fwts_framework *fw)
> }
>
> /* How many CPUs are there? */
> - for (cpus = 0; (entry = readdir(dir)) != NULL;)
> + for (cpus = 0; (entry = readdir(dir)) != NULL; )
> if (entry &&
> (strlen(entry->d_name)>3) &&
> (strncmp(entry->d_name, "cpu", 3) == 0) &&
> @@ -226,7 +227,7 @@ static int cstates_test1(fwts_framework *fw)
>
> rewinddir(dir);
>
> - for (i = 0; (cpus > 0) && (entry = readdir(dir)) != NULL;) {
> + for (i = 0; (cpus > 0) && (entry = readdir(dir)) != NULL; ) {
> if (entry &&
> (strlen(entry->d_name)>3) &&
> (strncmp(entry->d_name, "cpu", 3) == 0) &&
Acked-by: Ivan Hu <ivan.hu at canonical.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/fwts-devel/attachments/20180910/1c40b73c/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/fwts-devel/attachments/20180910/1c40b73c/attachment.sig>
More information about the fwts-devel
mailing list