ACK: [PATCH v2] acpi: method: sbbr: set some methods as optional
Alex Hung
alex.hung at canonical.com
Tue Sep 5 19:15:55 UTC 2017
On 2017-09-05 06:09 AM, Sakar Arora wrote:
> As per SBBR spec, methods _WAK and _PTS are made optional.
>
> Method _SST is mandatory. But its absence is now reported
> as warning. Systems that do not support user visible
> status such as LED (e.g. ARM FVP), can treat this as just
> warning. Others must treat _SST method's absence as failure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sakar Arora <Sakar.Arora at arm.com>
> ---
> src/acpi/method/method.c | 48 +++++++++---------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/acpi/method/method.c b/src/acpi/method/method.c
> index d082fc1..d1e5e87 100644
> --- a/src/acpi/method/method.c
> +++ b/src/acpi/method/method.c
> @@ -4449,12 +4449,13 @@ static int method_test_SST(fwts_framework *fw)
> arg[0].Type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
> for (i = 0; i <= 4; i++) {
> arg[0].Integer.Value = i;
> - if (fw->flags & FWTS_FLAG_TEST_SBBR)
> - ret = method_evaluate_method(fw, METHOD_MANDATORY,
> - "_SST", arg, 1, method_test_NULL_return, NULL);
> - else
> - ret = method_evaluate_method(fw, METHOD_OPTIONAL,
> - "_SST", arg, 1, method_test_NULL_return, NULL);
> + ret = method_evaluate_method(fw, METHOD_OPTIONAL,
> + "_SST", arg, 1, method_test_NULL_return, NULL);
> +
> + if (ret == FWTS_NOT_EXIST && (fw->flags & FWTS_FLAG_TEST_SBBR)) {
> + fwts_warning(fw, "_SST method not found. This should be treated as error "
> + "if the platform provides user visible status such as LED.");
> + }
>
> if (ret != FWTS_OK)
> break;
> @@ -6483,23 +6484,7 @@ static int method_test_PTS(fwts_framework *fw)
> arg[0].Integer.Value = i;
>
> fwts_log_info(fw, "Test _PTS(%d).", i);
> - if (!(fw->flags & FWTS_FLAG_TEST_SBBR))
> - method_evaluate_method(fw, METHOD_OPTIONAL, "_PTS", arg, 1, method_test_NULL_return, NULL);
> - else
> - if (method_evaluate_method(fw, METHOD_MANDATORY, "_PTS", arg, 1,
> - method_test_NULL_return, NULL) == FWTS_NOT_EXIST) {
> - fwts_advice(fw,
> - "Could not find _PTS. This method provides a "
> - "mechanism to do housekeeping functions, such "
> - "as write sleep state to the embedded "
> - "controller before entering a sleep state. If "
> - "the machine cannot suspend (S3), "
> - "hibernate (S4) or shutdown (S5) then it "
> - "could be because _PTS is missing. Note that "
> - "ACPI 1.0 wants _PTS to be executed before "
> - "suspending devices.");
> - break;
> - }
> + method_evaluate_method(fw, METHOD_OPTIONAL, "_PTS", arg, 1, method_test_NULL_return, NULL);
> fwts_log_nl(fw);
> }
> return FWTS_OK;
> @@ -6577,22 +6562,7 @@ static int method_test_WAK(fwts_framework *fw)
> arg[0].Type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
> arg[0].Integer.Value = i;
> fwts_log_info(fw, "Test _WAK(%d) System Wake, State S%d.", i, i);
> - if (!(fw->flags & FWTS_FLAG_TEST_SBBR))
> - method_evaluate_method(fw, METHOD_OPTIONAL, "_WAK", arg, 1, method_test_WAK_return, &i);
> - else
> - if (method_evaluate_method(fw, METHOD_MANDATORY, "_WAK", arg, 1,
> - method_test_WAK_return, &i) == FWTS_NOT_EXIST) {
> - fwts_advice(fw,
> - "Section 7.3.7 states that a system that wakes "
> - "from a sleeping state will invoke the _WAK "
> - "control to issue device, thermal and other "
> - "notifications to ensure that the operating system "
> - "checks the states of various devices, thermal "
> - "zones, etc. The Linux kernel will report an "
> - "ACPI exception if _WAK is does not exist when "
> - "it returns from a sleep state.");
> - break;
> - }
> + method_evaluate_method(fw, METHOD_OPTIONAL, "_WAK", arg, 1, method_test_WAK_return, &i);
> fwts_log_nl(fw);
> }
> return FWTS_OK;
>
Acked-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung at canonical.com>
More information about the fwts-devel
mailing list