ACK: [PATCH 2/2] fwts-test: rsdp-0001: sync test with latest rsdp test changes

[Alex Hung]

On 2016-07-22 01:02 AM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
> ---
>  fwts-test/rsdp-0001/rsdp.log | 9 +++++----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fwts-test/rsdp-0001/rsdp.log b/fwts-test/rsdp-0001/rsdp.log
> index 6a59fd0..21c4f5a 100644
> --- a/fwts-test/rsdp-0001/rsdp.log
> +++ b/fwts-test/rsdp-0001/rsdp.log
> @@ -7,9 +7,10 @@ rsdp            characters.
>  rsdp            PASSED: Test 1, RSDP: revision is 2.
>  rsdp            PASSED: Test 1, RSDP: at least one of RsdtAddress or
>  rsdp            XsdtAddress is non-zero.
> -rsdp            FAILED [MEDIUM] RSDPBothAddressesFound: Test 1, RSDP: only
> -rsdp            one of RsdtAddress or XsdtAddress should be non-zero. Both
> -rsdp            fields are non-zero.
> +rsdp            NOTE: The RSDT and XSDT are both defined. An operating
> +rsdp            system supporting ACPI 1.0 should use the RSDT, otherwise
> +rsdp            it will use the XSDT. RSDT = 0x3674202324, XSDT =
> +rsdp            0x3220176896
>  rsdp            PASSED: Test 1, RSDP: the correct RSDT/XSDT address is
>  rsdp            being used.
>  rsdp            PASSED: Test 1, RSDP: the table is the correct length.
> @@ -17,6 +18,6 @@ rsdp            PASSED: Test 1, RSDP second checksum is correct
>  rsdp            PASSED: Test 1, RSDP: the reserved field is zero.
>  rsdp
>  rsdp            ==========================================================
> -rsdp            8 passed, 1 failed, 0 warning, 0 aborted, 0 skipped, 0
> +rsdp            8 passed, 0 failed, 0 warning, 0 aborted, 0 skipped, 0
>  rsdp            info only.
>  rsdp            ==========================================================
>

Acked-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung at canonical.com>