[PATCH 2/2] acpi: madt: Add support for ACPI 6.1

Jeffrey Hugo jhugo at codeaurora.org
Tue Jul 19 21:34:01 UTC 2016


On 7/19/2016 3:19 PM, Al Stone wrote:
> On 07/17/2016 05:18 PM, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
>> ACPI 6.1 introduces a new FADT/MADT version combination.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo at codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>  src/acpi/madt/madt.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/acpi/madt/madt.c b/src/acpi/madt/madt.c
>> index 0926f64..9218a75 100644
>> --- a/src/acpi/madt/madt.c
>> +++ b/src/acpi/madt/madt.c
>> @@ -84,27 +84,27 @@
>>   * subtable is doing okay.  And that's what our tests below check.
>>   *
>>   *
>> - * FADT Major Version ->       1    3    4     4     5     5     6    6
>> - * FADT Minor Version ->       x    x    x     x     x     1     0    0
>> - * MADT revision ->            1    1    2     3     3     3     3    4
>> - * Spec Version ->            1.0  2.0  3.0b  4.0a  5.0b  5.1a  6.0  6.0a
>> + * FADT Major Version ->       1    3    4     4     5     5     6    6     6
>> + * FADT Minor Version ->       x    x    x     x     x     1     0    0     1
>> + * MADT revision ->            1    1    2     3     3     3     3    4     4
>> + * Spec Version ->            1.0  2.0  3.0b  4.0a  5.0b  5.1a  6.0  6.0a  6.1
>>   * Subtable Name	Type  Expected Length ->
>> - * Processor Local APIC  0x0    8    8    8     8     8     8     8    8
>> - * IO APIC               0x1   12   12   12    12    12    12    12   12
>> - * Int Src Override      0x2   10   10   10    10    10    10    10   10
>> - * NMI Src               0x3    8    8    8     8     8     8     8    8
>> - * Local APIC NMI Struct 0x4    6    6    6     6     6     6     6    6
>> - * Local APIC Addr Ovrrd 0x5        16   12    12    12    12    12   12
>> - * IO SAPIC              0x6        20   16    16    16    16    16   16
>> - * Local SAPIC           0x7         8  >16   >16   >16   >16   >16  >16
>> - * Platform Int Src      0x8        16   16    16    16    16    16   16
>> - * Proc Local x2APIC     0x9                   16    16    16    16   16
>> - * Local x2APIC NMI      0xa                   12    12    12    12   12
>> - * GICC CPU I/F          0xb                         40    76    80   80
>> - * GICD                  0xc                         24    24    24   24
>> - * GICv2m MSI            0xd                               24    24   24
>> - * GICR                  0xe                               16    16   16
>> - * GIC ITS               0xf                                     16   20
>> + * Processor Local APIC  0x0    8    8    8     8     8     8     8    8     8
>> + * IO APIC               0x1   12   12   12    12    12    12    12   12    12
>> + * Int Src Override      0x2   10   10   10    10    10    10    10   10    10
>> + * NMI Src               0x3    8    8    8     8     8     8     8    8     8
>> + * Local APIC NMI Struct 0x4    6    6    6     6     6     6     6    6     6
>> + * Local APIC Addr Ovrrd 0x5        16   12    12    12    12    12   12    12
>> + * IO SAPIC              0x6        20   16    16    16    16    16   16    16
>> + * Local SAPIC           0x7         8  >16   >16   >16   >16   >16  >16   >16
>> + * Platform Int Src      0x8        16   16    16    16    16    16   16    16
>> + * Proc Local x2APIC     0x9                   16    16    16    16   16    16
>> + * Local x2APIC NMI      0xa                   12    12    12    12   12    12
>> + * GICC CPU I/F          0xb                         40    76    80   80    80
>> + * GICD                  0xc                         24    24    24   24    24
>> + * GICv2m MSI            0xd                               24    24   24    24
>> + * GICR                  0xe                               16    16   16    16
>> + * GIC ITS               0xf                                     16   20    20
>
> Again, as mentioned before, I would recommend making the ITS length 20 for
> the ACPI 6.0 entry.

Maybe not clear from the diff, but the documentation was 20, and the 
implementation was 16.  I decided that the documentation here should 
match the implementation, since it seemed like the desire was to keep 
the implementation to match the spec.

I think that making the implementation match the intent of the spec 
(length 20) per your comment on "Re: [PATCH] acpi: madt: Fix ITS 
subtable length check" makes sense, perhaps with a short note about why 
fwts diverged from the spec.

I'll add that to this series and repost.

>
> Otherwise, this all looks good.  And thanks again for submitting these!
>
>>   *
>>   * In the table, each length entry is what should be in the length
>>   * field of the subtable, and -- in general -- it should match the
>> @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@
>>   */
>>
>>  #define FADT_MAX_MAJOR_REVISION	((uint8_t)6)
>> -#define FADT_MAX_MINOR_REVISION	((uint8_t)0)
>> +#define FADT_MAX_MINOR_REVISION	((uint8_t)1)
>>  #define MADT_MAX_REVISION	((uint8_t)4)
>>
>>  #define SUBTABLE_UNDEFINED	0x00
>> @@ -193,6 +193,14 @@ static struct acpi_madt_subtable_lengths spec_info[] = {
>>  		.lengths = { 8, 12, 10, 8, 6, 12, 16, SUBTABLE_VARIABLE,
>>  			     16, 16, 12, 80, 24, 24, 16, 20 }
>>  	},
>> +	{ /* for ACPI 6.1 */
>> +		.major_version = 6,
>> +		.minor_version = 1,
>> +		.madt_version = 4,
>> +		.num_types = 16,
>> +		.lengths = { 8, 12, 10, 8, 6, 12, 16, SUBTABLE_VARIABLE,
>> +			     16, 16, 12, 80, 24, 24, 16, 20 }
>> +	},
>>  	{ /* terminator */
>>  		.major_version = 0,
>>  		.minor_version = 0,
>>
>
>


-- 
Jeffrey Hugo
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm 
Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.



More information about the fwts-devel mailing list