ACK: [PATCH 1/2] acpi: erst: fix incorrect error message for reserved field
Colin Ian King
colin.king at canonical.com
Sat Jan 30 10:35:45 UTC 2016
On 30/01/16 10:12, Alex Hung wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung at canonical.com>
> ---
> src/acpi/erst/erst.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/acpi/erst/erst.c b/src/acpi/erst/erst.c
> index 1330c64..d28aa92 100644
> --- a/src/acpi/erst/erst.c
> +++ b/src/acpi/erst/erst.c
> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static int erst_test1(fwts_framework *fw)
> passed = false;
> fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_LOW,
> "ERSTReservedNonZero",
> - "ERST Reserved field must be non-zero, got 0x%" PRIx32
> + "ERST Reserved field must be zero, got 0x%" PRIx32
> " instead", erst->reserved);
> }
> if (erst->serialization_header_size > table->length) {
>
Well spotted.
Acked-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
More information about the fwts-devel
mailing list