ACK: [PATCH v2 5/5] Update regression test rsdp-0001/test-0001.sh

[Colin Ian King]

On 09/02/16 23:12, Al Stone wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Al Stone <al.stone at linaro.org>
> ---
>  fwts-test/rsdp-0001/rsdp.log | 17 +++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fwts-test/rsdp-0001/rsdp.log b/fwts-test/rsdp-0001/rsdp.log
> index 6a3efec..6a59fd0 100644
> --- a/fwts-test/rsdp-0001/rsdp.log
> +++ b/fwts-test/rsdp-0001/rsdp.log
> @@ -1,9 +1,22 @@
>  rsdp            rsdp: RSDP Root System Description Pointer test.
>  rsdp            ----------------------------------------------------------
>  rsdp            Test 1 of 1: RSDP Root System Description Pointer test.
> -rsdp            PASSED: Test 1, No issues found in RSDP table.
> +rsdp            PASSED: Test 1, RSDP first checksum is correct
> +rsdp            PASSED: Test 1, RSDP: oem_id contains only printable
> +rsdp            characters.
> +rsdp            PASSED: Test 1, RSDP: revision is 2.
> +rsdp            PASSED: Test 1, RSDP: at least one of RsdtAddress or
> +rsdp            XsdtAddress is non-zero.
> +rsdp            FAILED [MEDIUM] RSDPBothAddressesFound: Test 1, RSDP: only
> +rsdp            one of RsdtAddress or XsdtAddress should be non-zero. Both
> +rsdp            fields are non-zero.
> +rsdp            PASSED: Test 1, RSDP: the correct RSDT/XSDT address is
> +rsdp            being used.
> +rsdp            PASSED: Test 1, RSDP: the table is the correct length.
> +rsdp            PASSED: Test 1, RSDP second checksum is correct
> +rsdp            PASSED: Test 1, RSDP: the reserved field is zero.
>  rsdp            
>  rsdp            ==========================================================
> -rsdp            1 passed, 0 failed, 0 warning, 0 aborted, 0 skipped, 0
> +rsdp            8 passed, 1 failed, 0 warning, 0 aborted, 0 skipped, 0
>  rsdp            info only.
>  rsdp            ==========================================================
> 
Acked-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>