ACK: [PATCH] Revert "acpi: tpm2: add check for zero control area address (LP: #1506442)"
ivanhu
ivan.hu at canonical.com
Thu Apr 21 09:59:13 UTC 2016
On 2016年04月21日 16:30, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
>
> Turns out that a zero control area address can be zero to indicate that
> the Control Area is not required. Kudos to Alex Hung for spotting this issue.
>
> This reverts commit 897b1164b7bfd2b46259906a04190f1cba46c34b.
> ---
> src/acpi/tpm2/tpm2.c | 14 +-------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/acpi/tpm2/tpm2.c b/src/acpi/tpm2/tpm2.c
> index f124b02..babbc62 100644
> --- a/src/acpi/tpm2/tpm2.c
> +++ b/src/acpi/tpm2/tpm2.c
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> /*
> * Copyright (C) 2010-2016 Canonical
> *
> - * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
> * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
> * of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> @@ -77,18 +77,6 @@ static int tpm2_test1(fwts_framework *fw)
> "TPM2's Start Method must be between one to eight, got 0x%" PRIx16,
> tpm2->start_method);
> }
> - /*
> - * Kernel: drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c checks for a zero address for
> - * the control area because some versions of AMI BIOS have a bug where
> - * this address is zero and the kernel driver aborts on this.
> - */
> - if (!tpm2->address_of_control_area) {
> - passed = false;
> - fwts_failed(fw, LOG_LEVEL_HIGH,
> - "TPM2BadControlAreaAddress",
> - "TPM2's Control Area Address is expected to be non-zero, got 0x%16.16" PRIx64,
> - tpm2->address_of_control_area);
> - }
>
> if (tpm2->start_method == 2 && table->length != sizeof(fwts_acpi_table_tpm2) + 4) {
> passed = false;
>
Acked-by: Ivan Hu <ivan.hu at canonical.com>
More information about the fwts-devel
mailing list