MCFG test in fwts

[Alex Hung]

I always thought it was done on purpose - ACPI tables that require
more attention are tested in independent tests and simple sanity
checks are done in a single big test.

It is not a bad idea to merge MCFG to acpitables. There are also other
possible tests that we can look into and merge to acpitables - dmar,
fadt and hpet_check.

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Colin Ian King
<colin.king at canonical.com> wrote:
> On 24/03/15 15:32, Colin Ian King wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> Due to "historical" implementation reasons (e.g. I messed up), we have a
>> MCFG test on its own, and also a MCFG stub that does not a lot in the
>> "acpitables" test.
>>
>> Should we keep the MCFG stand-alone test and remove the stub from the
>> acpitables test, or should we integrate the MCFG test into the
>> acpitables?  As it stands, it is a bit confusing and needs some attention.
>>
>> Colin
>>
> BTW, I've filed a bug for this issue so we don't lose it:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/fwts/+bug/1433603
>
> --
> fwts-devel mailing list
> fwts-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/fwts-devel



-- 
Cheers,
Alex Hung